NATURE:
“Earth’s immeasurable surprise”
Larkin in
comparison with Wordsworth and Robert Frost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Synopsis:
Larkin carves a niche as a
poet of nature as he treats nature as the source for fragile happiness in his
contact with nature. He does not recall the events of his contact with nature.
As a nature poet, he marks a cleat-cut difference between Wordsworth and Robert
Frost. Nature is plentiful with its beauty in variety for the gaiety of
onlookers. Poets look at nature and react to it in diverse ways. Some poets
like Wordsworth worship nature, giving it the status of divinity. Some poets
like Robert Frost treat nature as the source for rejuvenation on their
momentary contact with nature. Some poets like Philip Larkin enjoy the beauty
in nature for a little while and shares the plight of transient lives of leaves
and flowers. He observes cyclic changes in nature and sympathies with the
pathetic plight of the non-human world. He shares the suffering of animals,
birds, and other objects of nature.
Key words:
Nature, Wordsworth, beauty, gaiety, worship,
Robert Frost, momentary, contact, source, rejuvenation, Larkin, enjoy, beauty,
concur, time, powers, concern, transient, trees, greenness, grief, suffering,
seasons, cycle, objects, man, animals, birds, insects,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Research Article:
Nature is plentiful with
its beauty in variety for the gaiety of onlookers. Poets look at nature and
react to it in diverse ways. Some poets like Wordsworth worship nature giving
it the status of divinity. Some poets like Robert Frost treat nature as the
source for rejuvenation on their momentary contact with nature. Some poets like
Philip Larkin enjoy the beauty in nature for a little while, sharing the
suffering of trees for the transient lives of leaves and flowers.
Philip Larkin carves a
niche as a nature poet although he did not write extensively about it. He finds
nature as "earth's immeasurable surprise" but regrets the brevity of
verdant and floral beauty. Their beauty does not have eternity. In the endless
stream of time, the greenness of leaves, which is associated with joy,
transforms into the brownness of leaves at the time of their fall, reflecting
their transitory nature. Larkin feels it “a kind of grief” as he has sensitive
heart not only for the suffering of trees but also for human suffering. The joy
in life diminishes to sorrow due to seasonal changes.
,
The trees are coming into
leaf
Like something almost being said;
The recent buds relax and speed,
Their greenness is a kind of grief “The Trees” (CP, 166)
The charms of leaves and flowers diminish to
fall. Larkin feels sorry for the leaves and flowers that do not stay longer on
the stems as treasures for the pleasure of onlookers. Their glory is transient
for leaves fall in autumn and flowers fall after their ephemeral beautiful
life. Leaves shed but the trees have inherent power in wearing new leaves by
means of the "yearly trick of looking new" (TWW-12) in place of the
leaves fallen due to winter's deathblow.
Time in its endless flux,
brings about changes in the life of man as per annual seasons. Keats
appropriately calls them Human Seasons in his poem, Human Seasons’. The
seasonal changes occur in both nature and man, as the both, “exist in a
linear-time dimension”. Nature exists in time’s cyclical patterns. Nature exhibits seasonal cycles and natural
recurrences in the flux of time,
Time is the echo of an axe
Within a wood.
Poem: XXVI (CP, 295)
In the strict governance
of time, winter puts an end to the cycles of seasons every year. The changes in the life of man are akin to
those in the life of trees “every year”.
The seasonal changes in nature are cyclic in the reign of time. The trees as in “The Trees” have the renewal
of life and look “afresh” every year whereas man has no such inherent powers.
Larkin draws a striking
contrast between man and nature though man is its integral part. Man’s
fragility contrasts with that of the trees' restorative technique in the
seasonal cycle. Man’s flow of life is in
contrast with man for he lacks in the internal and integral restorative
power. His life becomes transient in
time’s flux as delineated in “Solar” and in “Sad Steps”:
You exist openly;
Our needs hourly
Climb and return like angels. “Solar”
(CP, 159)
Of being young: that it can’t come
again,
But is for others undiminished
somewhere “Sad Steps” (CP,
169)
When man is deprived of
the restorative power, he feels sorry for vulnerability. Nature has restorative powers: “the yearly
trick of looking new” (TWW,12).
Though the trees have
magical powers for restoration and mysterious technique of looking new every
year in the incessant flow of time, the beauty of spring is transient and
vulnerable because it wilts and withers away with the approach of winter as
life that ends with the coming of death at time’s call. The green leaves fall in autumn in the wake
of the disruption of winter, causing “a kind of grief”.
For Larkin, man's life for
transience, "Suffering is exact” (CP, 32) is akin to trees' grief as
Larkin tells mankind and feels for mankind for its transitory nature. As a poet
and man, he therefore shares the suffering of the human and the non-human
worlds. He says that man lives to suffer when he fails in his lifelong struggle
in search of meaning. He universalizes
human suffering by the use of “we”. He therefore shares the suffering of a rape
victim as an observer from distance but makes the reader understand and share
her pathetic plight:
Even so
distant, I can taste the grief,
"Deceptions" (CP-32)
Larkin finds an analogy
in the lives of creatures like man and those of trees, shrubbery, and creepers.
He marks a clear-cut departure from Wordsworth in the treatment of nature on
one hand and Robert Frost on the other.
Larkin’s early volume of
poems, The North ship shows the signs of Romanticism as in Yeats’s
early poems, “a paradise”. Poem III of The
North ship presents Larkin’s love of moonlit night:
The moon is full tonight
And hurts the eyes
It is so definite and bright,
What if it has drawn up
All quietness and certitude of worth
Wherewith to fill its cup. Poem:
III (TNS, 14)
Larkin submits himself to
the beauties of nature: moon, meadows
music, wind, etc., but comes to the world of reality where he finds full of
sadness:
How to recall such music, when the
street
Darkens? Among the rain and stone
places
I find only an ancient sadness
falling, Poem: IX, (TNS, 21)
With the advent of
spring, “All catches alight” (CP, 272) and birds “are crazed with flight” in
delight. This Larkin's attitude towards nature underwent a startling
transformation to be unique and mark a distinction from Wordsworth.
For Larkin, the delight
of spring is however transitory as winter falls every year in the flow of time
to destroy the beauty of spring. The
line in the poem, 'All catches alight', “A drum taps: a wintry drum” (CP, 273)
reminds us of the inevitability of the advent of winter to destroy the beauty
of spring as death that destroys youth in time’s flux,
Larkin watches
the beauty of spring and gets fragile happiness but feels sorry for the brevity
of spring. He entertains the readers for their participation in nature, but he
watches nature from a distance. For him,
nature looks outwardly beautiful for its ephemeral pleasure on one hand. He
shares the suffering of trees on the hand. He does not get any consolation from
the cyclic patterns of nature as in “The Trees”. He feels sympathy for the
trees' “greenness is a kind of grief” (CP, 166). He describes spring in
“Coming” which presents him momentary pleasure in the beauty of the
“fresh-peeled voice of a thrush” (CP, 33).
He deals with all the seasons in the flow of time including autumn as in
“Broadcast”. He enjoys child-like pleasure in walking through the thickly wide
spread of fallen leaves:
I lose
All but the outline of the still and
withering
Leaves on half-emptied trees.
“Broadcast” (CP, 140)
Wordsworth, like other
Romantic poets, goes to nature for its sights, scents and sounds to be its
thrall to its sensuous beauty. He gets engrossed into the beauty of nature for
bliss. He worships nature since he finds ecstasy and solace in contact with
nature. He treats nature as mother and teacher. He gets infinite pleasures for
the treasures of nature. He revives the memories of the beauteous forms of
nature seen earlier.
And then my heart with pleasure
fills
And dances with the daffodils.
“The Daffodils” (Poetical works)
Wordsworth stresses the
harmony that exists between the soul of man and the soul of nature whereas
Robert Frost has contact with nature for momentary pleasure in its contact only
to do the work at hand with new vigor and enthusiasm. Wordsworth on the
contrary gets engrossed into the beauty of nature to enjoy bliss:
A poet could not but be gay
In such a jocund company;
I gazed – and gazed – but little
thought
What wealth the show to me had
brought. “The Daffodils”
Larkin’s
treatment of nature is different from Wordsworth’s. Larkin is against
nature-worship like the other Movement poets. In Larkin, nature is time-bound.
For the transience of leaves and flowers, he feels sorry for that. He has
contact with nature for a fragile happiness in contrast with Wordsworth. He
remains outside nature’s romantic powers. As Bruce Martin points out,
“Larkin is
equally intent on deromanticizing Nature and man’s place in it. For one thing,
he doesn’t talk about Nature very often… We see a poet regretting that Nature
is not as Wordsworth promised, with Larkin, we find a man so removed from the
nineteenth–century debate over Nature that he never thought to take seriously
the notion of Nature as imminent benign.”
The momentary
contact with nature helps Robert Frost to forget the stress and strain of
reality on one hand and leave him refreshed and rejuvenated to attend his
duties with new vigor and enthusiasm on the other.
Larkin is in contrast
with Robert Frost who draws a line between man and nature but watches the
beauty of nature for a short while. In the momentary contact with nature, he
feels refreshed and rejuvenated to have new vigour and enthusiasm. The fact is
clear in his poem "Birches". He describes his momentary climb to
heaven by swinging birches. He comes back, realizing his sense of duty on
earth:
Earth is the right place for love
I do not know where it is likely to
go better
“Birches” (Mountain Interval & CP, 153)
For Larkin,
nature bestows on its beholder ephemeral pleasure. He does not recall the
memory of the pleasure got at the sight of beauties in nature unlike
Wordsworth. In this connection, he comments, “Deprivation is for me what
daffodils were for Wordsworth”. His poems reflect his not being one with his
environments:
No, I have never found
The place where I could say
This
is my proper ground,
Here I shall
stay; “Places, Loved Ones” (CP,
99)
Larkin’s treatment of nature is evident in
poems like “spring”. He keeps away from
nature, as Wordsworth’s type of union is impossible for him:
The branch-arrested mist of leaf, and me,
Threading my pursed-up way across
the park
And indigestible sterility.
“Spring” (CP, 39)
Larkin has contact with
the beauty of the songs of the stars, “their blazing solitude” for a fragile
pleasure but comes back to “the unquickened world” as a sign of his
separateness from nature:
The stars sang in their
sockets through the night:
‘Blow bright, blow bright
The coal of this unquickened
world’. “Night Music” (CP,
300)
Larkin draws a human
parallel to the non-human world. “First sight” reflects the fact that lambs do
not understand that the vast land, covered with snow in cold weather, provides
rare possibilities of life for them:
They would not grasp it is they
knew,
What so soon will wake and grow
Utterly unlike the snow. “First
Sight” (CP, 112)
Here lambs are ignorant
of “the eroding agents” (TLD, 26) of time to bring about changes in them. Larkin studies the action of grasping in the
lambs that are like children in Blake’s Songs of Innocence and bird in
Eliot's "Burnt Norton" of Four Quartets. Larkin says that the
lambs “would not grasp” as Robert Frost does in “At Woodward’s Gardens”,
referring to monkeys:
They might not understand a burning
– glass.
They might not understand the sun
itself.
It’s knowing what to do with things
that counts.
“At Woodward’s Gardens” (Robert
Frost’s Poems)
Larkin is very much
content with the momentary happiness that he gets in nature. His poetry reflects his love of nature and
nature’s hold on man. His love of nature
is seen in his cycle rides and walks in the countryside as Dale Salwak says,
On
Sunday, therefore, he would sometimes ask one of us, if we happened to be free,
to accompany him on cycle-rides or walks. The open country is very accessible
from Hull; in all directions, one has only to travel three or four miles to
reach wide pleasant, if flattish, countryside.
As Larkin is against
nature-worship, he remains outside nature’s powers of attraction and
absorption. As Bruce Martin says, “The
most honest and sympathetic figures in Larkin’s world go largely unrewarded;
with a rare exception those habits of mind become merely their own rewards,
necessary but insufficient for genuine joy.
The outsider for Larkin is always a pathetic figure”.
Hence, Larkin’s treatment
of nature comes closer to Robert Frost in “Stopping by woods on snowy
Evening”. The Frost speaker comes back
from nature like the Larkin speaker. The
Frost speaker is for his momentary escape to the beauty of nature but comes
back to realize the sense of man with the sense of duty:
Woods are lovely, dark and deep
But I have promises to keep
And miles to go before I sleep
And miles to go before I sleep.
“Stopping by
woods on a snowy Evening”
(Robert
Frost: The Aim was sung, 10)
Larkin has a momentary contact
with nature but comes back to realize his inevitable share in the suffering of
human and non-human worlds as he has sensitivity to suffering. As Blake Morrison points out, “… nature is
seen not as an autonomous organism which sometimes inspires ‘sublime’ feelings
but as a mechanism calculated to induce, and existing solely for human
pleasure”.
Larkin is a nature poet
in a different way. He is conscious of nature’s powers and their effect on
man. He beholds nature from distance for
a momentary pleasure, making the reader participate in the scene. He responds to nature on his way:
To wake, and hear a cock
Out of the distance crying,
To pull the curtains back
And see the clouds flying- “Dawn”
(CP, 284)
Larkin is interested in
depicting the life of a common man and nature around him in a unique way but
not in Wordsworth’s tradition. He is an uncommon poet of the common man because
of his own sensitivity to suffering, especially the suffering of a common
man. Larkin’s depiction of life is like
that of Wordsworth’s “still, sad music of humanity”.
Larkin as a poet is more
attentive to human suffering than to the non-human world. As Davie says in support of Larkin that the
Movement poet “makes himself numb to non-human creation in order to stay
compassionate towards the human”.
The fragility of the
natural world is like that of human world.
“Cut Grass” reflects the emotion of sadness, attributed to the
transience of grass. Larkin shares its suffering as he shares that of man in
the strict governance of time. Not even a blade of grass leaves his heart
unmoved when it is cut off. The positive
response even to the blade of grass shows his sensitivity to the suffering of
flora, like the blade of grass as in “Cut Grass”. The life of grass is brief like that of
man. When grass is cut off, the stalks
of grass breathe their last,
Cut grass his frail:
Brief is the breath
Mown stalks exhale.
Long, long the death.
“Cut Grass”
(CP, 183)
Here nature, as a
benevolent force, evokes joy in the hearts of onlookers. The poet’s response to the human and
non-human worlds is unique. “Gladly my
tongue” shows his positive response to nature.
The image of the golden sheep serves as a source of joy in “To a Very
slow Air” but “Triple Time” written in the later stage presents a startling
transformation in his treatment of nature as the sheep stand for disappointed
hopes:
A valley cropped by fat neglected
chances
That we insensately forbore to
fleece. “Triple Time” (CP, 73)
Despite their constant growth in ageing, the
trees come to begin afresh because of their restorative powers every year. In
nature, trees have rebirth and renewal though they grow old. It is spring,
which is responsible for the renewal of being fresh in the trees every year:
Yet still the unresting castles
thresh
In full grown thickness every May
Last year is dead, they seem to say,
Begin afresh, afresh, afresh. “The Trees”
(CP, 166)
The trees have grief with
the advent of winter but all the joys with the coming of spring to fill nature
with full of charms. Their sorrow alternates with their joy. Unlike man, the
trees have rebirth and the renewal of spring every year. J. R. Watson points out this welcome feature:
“Yet each year they imply the renewal of all things, the rebirth of the world
in a recreation of the paradisal time”.
“Solar” presents the
theme of time, which is responsible for day and night cycle and the cycle of
seasons in a year. Larkin presents the sun rising and setting and the earth’s
travel on its own axis in a year,
The eye sees you
Simplified by distance
Into an origin. “Solar”(CP, 159).
The sun, which serves as
the symbol for energy, force, warmth, and life, enables the nine planets to
revolve in their respective orbits. As
Terry Whalen studies Larkin’s attitude towards sun, “The sun appears in
Larkin’s world as benevolent and mysterious and as the signification of a
dignity to life and a hope.”
Man depends on the sun
for life. The sun makes the earth rotate and becomes responsible for the cycle
of seasons. Man’s needs are “hourly” as he travels through time. The
"solar" doesn’t mean “sun” but the solar system and the nine planets
rotate to bring about cyclic changes. The constant recurrence of day and night
system in “Solar” is attributed to the sun that is suggestive of time’s endless
movement. The sun is eternal in ruling over the whole of human and non-human
life:
You exist openly,
Our needs hourly
Climb and return like angles,
Unclosing like a hand,
You give for ever.
“Solar” (CP, 159)
Time in its flow makes
the moon wax and wane spanning a month to culminate in a year. The earth’s
revolution around the sun makes the year witness the cyclic system of seasonal
occurrence. The poem reflects man’s beholding “Earth’s immeasurable surprise”
(TWW, 36). As a result, “one shivers slightly, looking up there” (CP, 169) as
an outsider.
The moon is suggestive of
youth and vigour, and spring is suggestive of youth is renewed once a year but
not youth. The moon reminds him of his youth in the past,
Is a reminder of the strength and
pain
Of being young; that can’t come
again,
But is for other undiminished
somewhere. “Sad Steps” (CP,
169)
Larkin
marks a clear-cut distinction by not sentimentalizing his youth in contrast
with the Romantics.
The
cyclical movement of water in nature from the sea via the cloud to the sea is
suggestive of the ceaseless flow of time. Water is invincible and
uncontrollable like time. The sea serves
as an inexhaustible source for any havoc to cause a colossal loss:
Rain
patters on a sea that tilts and sighs.
… … … …
Above the sea, the yet more
shoreless day,
Riddled by wind, trails lit-up
galleries:
They shift giant ribbing, sift away
Such attics dread of me! Such
absences! “Absences” (CP,
49)
Larkin sympathises with
the loss in “The Mower”. The Larkin speaker shares the suffering of an innocent
insect eating animal:
A hedgehog jammed up against the
blades;
Killed. It had been in the long
grass,
I had seen it before; and even fed
it, once.
… … … …
… … Burial was no help: “The Mower” (CP, 214).
Larkin has a
sensitive heart for suffering and so he expresses his heart-felt grief over the
demise of a hedgehog:
Next morning, I got up and it did
not
The first day after death, the new
absence
… … … …
Of each other, we should be kind
Where there is still time. “The Mower”
(CP, 214)
Larkin shares the pain of
the rabbit, poked with a walking stick by a city visitor to the countryside:
Caught in the center of a soundless
field
While hot inexplicable hours go
by. “Mixomatosis” (CP,
100)
Thus,
Larkin shares the suffering animals like rabbits but also that of birds like
pigeons:
On shallow slates the pigeons shift
together,
Backing against a thin rain from the
west
Blown across each sunk head and
settled feather. “Pigeons” (CP, 109)
“At Grass” explores a
human parallel to the racehorses. The horses reach the age of retirement in the
endless passage of time:
The eye can hardly pick them out
From the cold shade they shelter in,
Till wind distresses fail and mane;
Then one crops grass, and moves
about
- The other seeming to look on -
And stands anonymous again. “At Grass”
(CP, 29)
Larkin turns pathetic on
their retirement. “They can hardly pick them out”. The horses recall the
richness of the past. He has a special quality not only in sharing the
suffering of human and non-human worlds but also in the drawing of a human
parallel to the non-human world. He projects his ideas into the flora and the
fauna, attributing human motives in their actions. He expects the flora and
fauna to think, guess or understand like human beings with a view to establishing
an analogy between man and nature or between the human and the non-human
worlds. As Blake Morrison says that Larkin has “interest in drawing a human
parallel and in pointing a moral…”.
The horses are at present
free in the pensioned retirement position with some pleasant memories like
retired human beings:
Do memories plague their ears like
flies?
They shake their heads. Dusk brims
the shadows
… … … …
… …
the crowds and cries
All but the unmolesting meadows.
Almanacked, their names live; they
Have slipped their names, and stand
at ease,
Or gallop for what must be joy,
And not a field glass sees them
home,
Or curious stop – watch prophesies:
Only the groom, and the groom’s body
With bridles in the evening
come. “At Grass”
(CP, 29).
The expression: “They
shake their heads”, reflects the attribution of human motives as in Robert
Frost:
He gives his harness bells a shake
To ask if there is some mistake.
“Stopping
by Woods on a Snowy Evening”
(Robert Frost: The Aim was Sung, 10).
The last line of “At
Grass”: “With bridles in the evening come “means as the first line of “Going”,
“There is an evening coming in” does. John Lucas describes the conclusion as
“the beautiful ending” “with its almost pagan suggestion of life slipping into
the shadows.”
The poem “Wires” also
shows that the cattle gain maturity through painful experience like men. When
time flows, young cattle become old with the knowledge of “Electric limits to
their widest senses” (CP, 48).
Larkin says in “Absences”
about the elements of nature: rain, storm, water, waves, sea, etc. Water, which
is symbolic of time, comes in the form of rain from clouds to flow to the sea
as an unending source for the clouds to bring rain again,
Rain patters on a sea that tilts and
sighs,
Fast – running floors, collapsing
into hollows,
Tower suddenly, spray-haired,
contrariwise,
… … … …
Where there are no ships and no
shallows. “Absences” (CP,
49).
All the elements and
objects in nature: wind, moon, trees,
cock, etc., in the incessant movement remind us of time. In “Wedding Wind” the
wind which is found “thrashing/My apron” (TLD, 15) blew all wedding night and
all wedding day to create the feeling of fear because of the violence of nature
elements. Nature as portrayed in “Wedding Wind” is an instrument that time
handles to bring about many changes against the wishes of the bride and the
bridegroom. The wind conspires to spoil
the happiness of the wedded couple:
The wind blew all my wedding-day,
And my wedding-night was the night
of high wind;
And a stable door was banging, again and
again. “Wedding Wind” (CP, 11)
The wind blows not only
to spoil the happiness of the couple but also to cause suffering to beasts and
animals. So, the speaker shares their
suffering. The ever-blowing wind, which is suggestive of time flowing
endlessly, devastates not only the happiness of the human world but also that
of the non-human world. The poet
presents a lively description of the wind and its devastation.
… …
All is the wind
Hunting through clouds and forests,
thrashing
My apron and the hanging clothes on
the line. “Wedding wind” (CP, 11).
The speaker admits his
being defeated by the raging of the wind and tries “to go and shut it”, leaving
me/stupid in candlelight, hearing the rain" (CP, 11).
The wind is a disruptive
force of nature, but the speaker feels how wind is favourable to him,
Outside, the wind’s incomplete
unrest
Builds and disperses clouds about
the sky,
And dark towns heap up on the
horizon.
None of these cares for us. “Talking in Bed”
(CP, 129).
Nature reflects the
beholder’s emotions. The speaker in
“Ugly sister” watches nature outside, staying inside. The objects of nature
reflect the speaker’s emotions and feelings:
Let the music, and violin, cornet,
and drum
Drowse from my head. “Ugly
Sister” (CP, 292).
Larkin lays emphasis on
man’s separation from nature to reflect his complex relation with her (it). Nature has negative rewards to bestow on man.
Janice Rossen is right in referring to man’s complex relation with nature:
“Separation from nature occurs in much of Larkin’s work, and he may have
created poetry out of his lack of a satisfying connection with it”
Nature’s forces are
around man’s habitation. The church building in the passage of time collapses
and nature’s forces enter it. Grassy
plants grow up in the cracks of the church building. Nature becomes a part of church building,
Grass, weedy pavement, brambles,
buttress, sky,
A shapeless recognisable each week,
A purpose more obscure. “Church Going”
(CP, 97).
Larkin draws a
distinction between man’s limited powers and nature’s unlimited powers. In course of time, church collapses allowing
natural forces to enter it. He ultimately
admits nature’s dominance in the endless flow of time. He, as an agnostic, seeks isolation not only
from nature but also from religion, facing a basic problem that he does not
know “what to look for”.
Larkin watches not only
nature but also the social activities and festivities in isolation. His relationship with nature is so complex
that one cannot understand. He watches
the wind blowing endlessly in the dark during the night with its destroying
forces. He deals with nature as a destroying force in the later poetry but not
in the earlier poetry. His earlier
poetry reflects the speaker’s fragile pleasure in the watching of nature:
I lie and wait for morning, and the
birds,
The first steps going down the
unswept street,
Voices of girls with scarves around
their heads. Poem: XVI (CP, 277)
Larkin, as the poet of
nature, finds fragile happiness in his contact with nature. Keeping away from the scene of nature, he
observes cyclic changes in nature and sympathies with the pathetic plight of
the non-human world. He concurs with the
powers of nature in destroying man’s desires.
Poetcrit, 37-2
July-December 2024
NOTES
Abbreviations: Collected
Poems (CP). The North Ship (NS), The Less Deceived (TLD), The Whitsun Weddings
(TWW), High Windows (HW)
Bruce Martin, Philip
Larkin, (Larkin: Longman, 1957) 54.
Larkin, Required
Writing, (London, Faber & Faber, 1986) 47.
Dale Salwak (ed), Philip
Larkin: The Man and his work, (Iowa, Iowa Press, 1989) 29.
Bruce Martin,
Philip Larkin, 59
Blake Morrison: The
Movement: English Poetry and Fiction of the 1950s. London: Cambridge
University Press, 1980) 168.
Davie, (Quoted in Blake
Morrison), 171.
J. R. Watson, “The Other
Larkin” Critical Quarterly. Vol. 17, No. 4, Winter 1975, 356.
Terry Whalen, Philip
Larkin and English Poetry, (London: Macmillan, 1986) 72.
Blake Morrison, The
Movement, 170.
John Lucas, Modern
English Poetry: From Hardy to Hughes: A Critical Survey, (London:
Macmillan, 1986), 201.
Janice Rossen, Philip
Larkin: His Life’s Work, (Iowa: Iowa Press, 1989) 38.
Published: Poetcrit
37-2 July-Dec-2024
No comments:
Post a Comment